Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Dark Side

I really have to giggle about the 'dark side' comment on yesterday's post. My writing buddy was quite put out. She wondered why I didn't mention the 10,000 'light side' comments she'd made. Excuse me. Didn't I say I have a 'dark side' problem!

Well, today was a dark side anyhow. I started writing my first chapter book ever - target audience is 7, 8, and 9 yr olds. About third grade level. I googled and found a couple sites for research. One suggested I use the MS Word Readability Stats under the Spellchecker. 

I pulled up the 'new' book - 'Dog For Hire' - and discovered that the book, so far, is labeled as a Grade Level 3.2. I was pretty happy about that. Hit the target audience right on the nose.

Until...........

I pulled up 'Nothing But Blue Skies.' I had hoped, when I began writing this, that it would be an Edgy YA. Things changed and it became, I hoped, an Upper Middle Grade book. No. Not according to this 'tool' from MS. 'Blue' showed up as Grade Level 3.2. Go figure!

Okay - is this a coincidence? Both books at a 3.2 level? I pulled up my children's PB - it came up as a 3.3. Hmmm...... I pulled up my Adult Sci-Fi. You guessed it - 3.2. I'm beginning to wonder if there is a glitch in the system. 

I pulled up my synopsis for 'Blue' and it comes back as a 7.1. That destroys all theories of faulty software.

Needless to say, things got quite dark here in Cleveland, Ohio and it was sun-shiny bright outside. I looked at 'Blue,' trying to figure out what on earth was 'wrong' with it. I don't know. The sentences per paragraph are short because I like short paragraphs. But the vocabulary is good (I kind of pride myself on my vocabulary's range). The computer can't 'see' the plot or the characters - it only goes by the sentences and vocabulary. The sentence structure is good. I even use a semi-colon now and again. *g*

I was going to go back and redo the whole of 'Nothing But Blue Skies' - all the while filled with sadness at the work before me. 

BUT - I decided to look at chapter one. Ch. one has been gone over with a fine-toothed comb. It can't be any better. As I perused the chapter, I saw good sentence structure, good vocabulary, and an excellent (if I may say so myself) plot.  Only got a 3.2. Okay. It's not me - it's the program. *g*

I put up a question/post at the SCBWI LinkedIn group, but nobody has responded. I think I'll just figure MS doesn't quite have the software down pat. I'm not going to go back and change 'Blue.' 

I finished the synopsis with the changes/suggestions from my editor and my writing classmates. It's time to bite the bullet and start sending out requests for representation by a literary agency. Wish me luck.

Life is interesting. 

4 comments:

  1. I would never trust a program like Word to make a judgement like that, any more than I let it tell me what my grammar should be. It doesn't always know what is write because it doesn't know what I want. I think it's much safer to trust yourself because you DO know what is good and what isn't, and what your intentions are. I suppose that program is part of Word for a reason, but it's not a person, it's not a reader, and it just doesn't know some things.

    Just for fun, I put in a couple of my LoG chapters, seems they are at about a 6th grade level.... Not sure what I think about that! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. What's up to all, the contents existing at this web site are genuinely amazing for people knowledge, well, keep up the good work fellows.

    Feel free to visit my web blog - luxe vakantieparken frankrijk ()

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Margaret. You had me rolling about LoG. I would have thought your pieces were at least Sophomore or Junior in High School. (Psst - you wrote 'write' instead of 'right.' I'm surprised the blog police didn't ring their alarm bells.) giggle giggle snort snort Miss you to pieces.

    ReplyDelete